Monday, October 15, 2018

Elizabeth Warren's DNA

I'm going start off with this:  Any comments about Warren's politics will be deleted.  

Elizabeth Warren has, for years, claimed to be an American Indian.  I have no doubt she believed it to be true and now DNA testing has validated the claim - to a point.  I doubt she can meet the blood quantum of any recognized tribe.  My point here is that Elizabeth Warren is not alone.  There are probably more of us claiming "great-grandpa was an Indian princess" than there are doing the opposite. (That line in quotes?  I totally stole it from a book called How To Talk Trash In Cherokee.)

Like Elizabeth Warren, I've grown up with stories of American Indian ancestry.  I've never claimed to be anything but the white girl I am, because I've got no documentation and because it's so far back I've probably got like one chromosome.  Most of the tales agree it came down the Parker line, and photographs of my mother and her father enforce that theory.








All the documentation I've found on my genealogy, however, lists the race as white.  This isn't proof that we're "lying" about the DNA being there.  Many American Indians chose to pass as other races, largely to avoid things like The Trail Of Tears.  Some claimed to be black, which speaks volumes about how they were treated... they'd prefer to be seen as black even before the Civil War!  I suspect something like this happened in my family.

Why do I insist on still believing it?  Because there is other evidence.  Physical Anthropology recognizes three skeletal types - one of which is Asian/American Indian.  Some of the physical markers?  High arches in the foot -- My mother had trouble finding shoes that fit comfortably. (Not that she wore them often, but I digress.)  Winged incisors and shovel-shaped teeth. High cheekbones, of course.  Shape of the eye socket.

With the skin on, of course, you also get the skin color.  All of these things are present in my documented-white family, varying in degree by individual.  Other physical indicators I've heard, but honestly have not deeply researched:  second toe being longer and slightly separated from the big toe.  Tendency toward diabetes and thyroid issues. All present in my family.

A note about DNA tests:  DNA can "fall away".  If Elizabeth Warren's test had not shown her native ancestor, it's possible he might still exist, especially considering the number of ensuing generations.  There is also the possibility that said ancestor was adopted into the tribe and therefore not genetically a part of said tribe.

When all the fuss started about Elizabeth Warren lying about her heritage, I was insulted.  She believed it to be true.  Just like me. If the university in question took her at her word, not requiring documentation, that's hardly her fault.  To say she lied is to say every one of us seeking our own hiding ancestry is a liar. 




2 comments:

  1. Thank you for posting this! I am a biological anthropologist and a lot of my colleagues wrote very disparaging posts about the use of genetic testing and shared some of the posts by Native American activists. While I understand their point, I also believe that our family narratives and oral histories are valid as well. In my own case. my grandfather told me we were descended from Border Reivers in Scotland. I didn't really know what that was all about until I moved close to the border here in England and began looking into it. Lo and behold, he was right and I found a rich history of my ancestors across the border in Scotland. One of my cousins had DNA testing which confirmed our descent from a border clan, but I really didn't need that to believe it. Another family narrative was that my great-grandfather was Jewish. That's all we knew because my grandmother was illegitimate and adopted as a small child. All we had was the name on her birth certificate. After delving into our genealogy using census documents, I believe I have found him - a Russian Jew who escaped the pogroms of the late 19th century and emigrated to the USA as a child. Does that make me Jewish? Of course not! Do I need genetic testing to confirm it? No, what difference would that make? It wouldn't prove anything given the uncertainties in that type of testing. In both cases, our family's oral histories made me curious about the actual history of these ancestors and interested in reading more about them. How can that be a bad thing?

    ReplyDelete
  2. My own experience with family lore has been about 50/50. The ones that were false, though, had some basis in truth. For example, my "Harper Valley Harpers" turned out to be Harpers from nearby. Cousins at best...

    ReplyDelete